TFB Armorer's Bench: Converting 20rd STEN Mags Back to 32rds

Sam.S
by Sam.S

Welcome everyone to the TFB Armorer's Bench! This series focuses on home armorer and gunsmith activities to help you improve your knowledge, enrich your skills, and maintain your firearms. Today, I'm tackling something that caught me off guard when I started building my STEN Mk2 - converting those Indian-modified 20rd magazines back to their original 32rd capacity. When I bought my parts kit and started shopping for magazines, I kept running into these 20rd mags and wondered what the heck was going on. Turns out there's an interesting history behind this conversion, and more importantly, it's completely reversible with basic tools.


More Armorer’s Bench Content:


TFB Armorer's Bench: Converting 20rd STEN Mags Back to 32rds

Here, we at TFB hope to inform, entertain, and even inspire any would-be gunsmith or armorer out there. Ideally, with the information I provide and with the help of our sponsors, you can have some useful knowledge pertaining to the conservation and improvement of firearms technology while at the same time sharing experiences and teaching each other new tips and tricks along the way in the comments. Digging deep into what it is to be an armorer or gunsmith has significance but what is important is what those people do to show they’ve earned that title. I am happy to share my experiences and knowledge and hope it is informative!


Make your personal safety a priority:

  1. Practice proper gun safety. Always make sure before the firearm hits your bench that it is unloaded and safe to be handled.
  2. Wear the proper safety equipment. The main one would be safety glasses (decent ones) since parts are often under spring tension and you may work with high RPM tools. Other honorable mentions would be latex gloves or a respirator when working with potentially harmful solvents and oils. Also hearing protection when working with loud machinery or test-firing firearms.
  3. Modifications, alterations, and customizations will void your firearm’s warranty 9.5 times out of 10. Please take that into consideration before attempting any at-home gunsmithing.
  4. If you are unsure about proper safety practices, disassembly procedures, or warranty standards, stop, put down the tools, and consult a competent gunsmith.


The STEN Gun and Its Magazine Problem

The STEN submachine gun represents one of Britain's most pragmatic wartime designs. Facing desperate shortages after Dunkirk and needing something cheap to produce quickly, designers Reginald Shepherd and Harold Turpin created a gun that could be built for about $11. Nearly 4 million STENs rolled off British production lines during WWII, making it the second most-produced submachine gun of the war after the Soviet PPSh-41.

PPSh-41 - Photo Credit: Wikimedia Commons

But the STEN had issues, particularly with its magazines. The original 32-round design was a double-stack, single-feed configuration that required a stiff spring and was notoriously temperamental. Feed lips would spread over time, especially when magazines were stored loaded, leading to jams and failures to feed. The magazines needed that top cartridge sitting at exactly 7-8 degrees for reliable feeding, and when things went wrong, they went really wrong.

STEN MK2 - Photo Credit: Wikimedia Commons

Quick note on the name. The name “STEN”, allegedly or most widely, is claimed to come from Shepherd, Turpin, and ENfield. Some sources also claim that the EN stands for ENgland. Matt M has an excellent video breaking this down. I highly recommend checking it out!

The Indian Central Railway Solution

After the war, the Indian military inherited thousands of STENs and quickly discovered what British troops had been complaining about: the magazines were a weak point (one of many. It's a crude “tube gun” after all). Rather than just living with unreliable feeding, the Indian Central Railway Workshop took action.

Their solution was brilliantly simple: convert the troublesome double-stack magazines to single-stack by inserting brass rods inside the magazine body.

The conversion involved installing four 3/32-inch brass rods - two on each side of the magazine's interior walls. These rods forced cartridges into a single column, eliminating the finicky double-stack-to-single-feed transition that caused most feeding problems. Capacity dropped from 32 rounds to about 19-20, but reliability improved dramatically. The Indian military felt this trade-off was worth it, and these converted magazines served them well for decades.

You'll sometimes find these converted magazines marked with "I.C.R.1" stamps, indicating the First Workshop of the Indian Central Railway that performed the conversion work.


Methods I've Seen

Before I get into how I approached this, let me cover the different techniques I've come across. There are really two parts to this conversion: dealing with the brass rod tails at the bottom of the magazine, and removing the rod heads that are ground flush with the magazine body at the top.

For the bottom tails, I've seen people use flathead screwdrivers to pry them up until they're sticking straight out. Others go the brute force route with pliers, either prying them up or just clipping them off entirely. I even saw one guy using a sharp chisel to shear the tails off by running it down the magazine body, though I'd recommend using a beater chisel for this, not your good woodworking tools.

The top ends present a different challenge since they're ground flush and sometimes peened over like rivets. I've seen claims that you need a drill press for this, but that's unnecessary overcomplication. The key is just drilling straight down to remove enough material so the rods can be pulled out.

My Method and Tools

Here's what worked for me, keeping things simple and practical:


Tool List:

  • Punch (for floor plate removal)
  • Small hammer
  • Flathead screwdriver
  • Heavy-duty pliers
  • Hand drill with 9/64" bit
  • Safety glasses (non-negotiable)


Step-by-Step Process:

First, I removed the floor plate. These plates are bent over the magazine sides and can be stubborn. Insert your punch and press the floor plate against the internal base plate that's being pushed by the magazine spring. While holding this pressure, give the back of the floor plate a few light taps with your hammer toward the front of the magazine. This creates a gap where you can insert your flathead screwdriver and pry the plate forward. Watch out - that magazine spring is under tension and will launch out if you're not ready for it.

With the spring and follower removed, you can see all four brass rods clearly.

I used my heavy-duty pliers to either pry up the bottom tails or snip them off completely. The goal is just to free the bottom end of each rod so it can be pushed in and out of the magazine.

For the top ends, I used my hand drill with a 9/64" bit. No need for a drill press or fancy setup - I just held the magazine steady on my workbench and drilled down into each rod head. You'll know you're in the right spot because the shavings will be brass-colored. A couple of quick zaps with the drill was enough to create clearance for the rods to be removed.

Once the tails were freed and the tops were drilled, the rods either fell right out or needed a gentle pull with pliers from the inside of the magazine. Simple as that.

Results and Reality Check

After converting my magazines, most held 31-32 rounds, though a couple stubborn ones only took 31. I suspect this variation comes down to differences in follower dimensions, spring strength, and magazine body condition. I had one dented magazine that maxed out at 31 rounds instead of 32.

Here's the thing that made me understand why the Indians did their conversion in the first place: you can hear and feel the cartridges dancing around at the bottom of a full magazine. There's definitely more play in the double-stack configuration, which explains why the single-stack conversion improved reliability even if it sacrificed capacity.

I haven't had range time with my STEN build yet to compare reliability between original and converted magazines, but the theory makes sense. The Indian military wasn't making this modification for fun - they were solving a real operational problem. I just like the idea of having things as original as possible. 20rd mags are cheap enough still if I wanted more.

Before I wrap up, I want to give credit to fellow TFB writer Matt M and his Armorers Bench blog and YouTube channel. His STEN content is extremely well researched and helpful. Nice to know he is on the same team while I’m bringing my STEN back to life.

Final Thoughts: Converting 20rd STEN Mags Back to 32rds

Converting these magazines back to original capacity is straightforward work that doesn't require special tools or skills. The hardest part is finding the STEN magazines these days, but when you do come across bundles of the 20-round Indian conversions, now you know they're not some oddball variant.

Whether you keep them as 20-rounders for that authentic post-war reliability or convert them back to their original capacity is up to you. Both have their place, but for a semi-auto build where you're not doing mag dumps, having the extra rounds is probably worth it.

As always, thank you for reading TFB! Be safe out there, have fun while shooting, and we will see you next time for the TFB Armorer's Bench! Also, let us know what you think in the comments below! We always appreciate your feedback.

Sam.S
Sam.S

Staff Writer: TheFirearmBlog & AllOutdoor.com | Certified Gunsmith | Published Author | Firearm History Enthusiast

More by Sam.S

Comments
Join the conversation
 1 comment
  • Per85172182 Per85172182 on Oct 27, 2025

    Hoping some magazine expert/engineer can address a widespread problem with MAC M-10 9mm magazines. Many aftermarket mags for the original doublestack, doublefeed type for original guns lack the bulged out thingie on each side that prevents over-insertion. When the mag goes in too far, the bolt ends up hitting and hanging up on the top of the mag instead of just pushing the round into the chamber. I haven't yet tried the quick and dirty way of just putting a hose clamp around the mag, appropriately located to stop insertion where it needs to stop. Since that would be adjustable, that might be the correct first step to determine exactly how far in the mag needs to go before applying the more elegant, permanent solution. Problem is, I don't know what that permanent fix would be for someone of my limited shop skills. Any thoughts before I waste a case of ammo sorting this out?


    Thanks,


    MDP

Next