Surprise, Virginia Now Has Its Own "Assault Weapons" Ban

Zac K
by Zac K
This shotgun has all sorts of features that would get it a place in the new Virginia assault weapons ban. [Zac K.]

Virginia’s leaders have taken a page from Dianne Feinstein’s 1990s playbook and, surprisingly, passed a new assault weapons ban (their words, not ours). If the state senate gives its approval, big changes are going to come for gun owners in Old Dominion.


Rules, rules, rules about guns @ TFB:

The story so far

At the start of 2026, Virginia’s politicians started working on pushing through all kinds of gun control, including a potential super-tax on suppressors (that one was canceled—see here) and other laws that introduced more regulations for gun stores, and banning the sale of so-called assault weapons. The assault weapon ban looked like it was dead for a while, but apparently, SB749 has been pushed through now, after some tinkering and fine-tuning.

The new assault weapons ban is pretty broad, catching all the obvious stuff as well as oddities like revolving shotguns. [Zac K.]

The exact wording from the state government’s website says this new law “Creates a Class 1 misdemeanor for any person who imports, sells, manufactures, purchases, or transfers an assault firearm, as that term is defined in the bill with some exceptions, and prohibits a person who has been convicted of such violation from purchasing, possessing, or transporting a firearm for a period of three years from the date of conviction. The bill provides that an assault firearm does not include any firearm that is an antique firearm, has been rendered permanently inoperable, or is manually operated by bolt, pump, lever, or slide action. The bill also prohibits the sale of a large capacity ammunition feeding device, as that term is defined in the bill. The bill provides that any person who willfully and intentionally (i) sells an assault firearm to another person or (ii) purchases an assault firearm from another person is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor and that any person who imports, sells, barters, transfers, or purchases a large capacity ammunition feeding device is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor.


Firearms made before July 1, 2026, are not affected by this bill, but if you want a new AR with a standard-capacity magazine that was made on July 2 of this year, looks like Virginia’s new law will cause you some trouble.

The Kel-Tec PR57’s fixed mag puts it into the assault weapons category, since it has more than 15-round capacity. [Zac K.]

But it’s not just ARs. Virginia’s new law singles out any semi-auto centerfire rifle or pistol that has a fixed magazine capacity of more than 15 rounds. It also applies to rifles with detachable magazines as well as one other tactical feature (collapsible/folding/telescopic stock, or thumbhole stock, or foregrip, or pistol grip, or grenade launcher, or threaded muzzle). There is similar wording for shotguns and pistols with similar features (barrel shrouds are a no-no now, for pistols in Virginia). Belt-fed firearms are now forbidden from sale, and so are revolving shotguns.

If you want a new AR mag in Virginia, by summertime, you’ll be restricted to lower-capacity, by law. [Zac K.]

Virginia’s politicians say that if you own these guns currently, you are OK, but you can’t buy or sell new ones in the state.

Currently, the bill has passed through all of the houses in Virginia’s state government and is simply awaiting the governor’s signature to become law.

Zac K
Zac K

Professional hoser with fudd-ish leanings.

More by Zac K

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 12 comments
  • ElGregorio ElGregorio 23 hours ago

    What exemptions have been written in for elected ‘officials’ and cops?


    Enough is enough.

    • MediumSizeTex MediumSizeTex 5 hours ago

      Last time I looked this up in 2024, there were a grand total of three (3) state level gun control laws which didn't come with LEO exemptions and carve-outs of some kind; two in New Jersey and one in Hawaii.

      The only gun control I support is disarming cops.

  • Uniform223 Uniform223 5 hours ago

    Firearms not politics, yet here we are. Owning a firearms or the right to bare arms was never seen as political in the past, when did it start?

    • James James 3 hours ago

      When one party supported stripping rights and the other party supported stripping rights slightly less.


Next