SILENCER SATURDAY #215: SIG Sauer SLH300TI & SLH762 Suppressors

Pete
by Pete
SILENCER SATURDAY: SIG Sauer SLH300TI & SLH762 Suppressors

Good afternoon everyone and welcome back to TFB’s Silencer Saturday brought to you by Yankee Hill Machine, manufacturers of the new YHM Phantom 22 rimfire suppressor. Last week we finally got to finish up our initial look the the LMT-AT ION 30 rifle suppressor (I’m a fan). This week we continue our discussion on SIG’s newest additions to the suppressor market – the SLH300TI and SLH762 models. Do they take full advantage of the benefits of additive manufacturing? Let’s find out.

SILENCER SATURDAY: SIG Sauer SLH300TI & SLH762 Suppressors
SIG Sauer @ TFB:

What is “Pending Research” when it comes to Form 1 applications?

Our man James does a quick breakdown on the “pending research” message when submitting Form 1 applications. It’s a good reminder on not to panic when emails from the ATF drop into your inbox.

This time frame ultimately proved to be correct, as the process took 13 calendar days and exactly 10 business days before my form cleared “Pending Research” and changed to “Submitted/In Process.”

In summary, there appear to be several circumstances under which you may encounter a “Pending Research” status when you submit a Form 1, but it appears that the research procedure will add “just” two weeks to the process.


Regulatory Updates:

From our friends at the American Suppressor Association:

The Definition of ‘‘Frame or Receiver’’ and Identification of Firearms is scheduled for publication in June 2022. If enacted as proposed, the primary objective of this rule is to establish broad regulations on homemade firearms and 80% receivers. As it pertains to suppressors, it will establish a new definition of a silencer frame or receiver and “complete muffler or silencer device“.

Analysis:

In a just and fair world, this new ruling would end the practice of requiring individual silencer parts being regulated as controlled items that require taxes and registration (see the Diversified Machine situation). However, I surmise that this new ruling/interpretation will restrict manufacturers to using the tube/main body as the serialized part. In recent years, many manufacturers have serialized bases or other parts to make repairs easier and not a taxable event. As noted by TFB staff, one alternative may be an re-interpretation of “solvent trap” parts. Cups and tubes that are just metal parts may become silencer parts at some undetermined point and time.

To me, both of these seem like additional penalties for people already complying with draconian laws. The real answer is complete deregulation and removal from the National Firearms Act (NFA).

From our friends at the American Suppressor Association:

ATF has stated that they will continue to focus resources on the considerable backlog of paper forms. Nonetheless, if you are going to buy a suppressor ASA strongly recommends that you submit all new transfers via eForms.

Two reminders:

  1. If you have a pending paper application, do not pull it to resubmit via eForms. Your form will take longer to get approved and it will divert resources from processing applications.
  2. If you absolutely must check the status of your pending Form 4 (paper or electronic), please call NFA Division at (304) 616-4500. Do not use the “Ask the Expert” function in eForms.

Analysis:

As we discussed in the EForms update in December, the new system promises to be faster and more efficient. Form 4 approvals are now coming back from late December of 2021 – about six weeks. However, if you have paper applications in process, do not scuttle them in order to submit one via the new EForms system. The ATF has said that doing so will create lengthy delays. The real answer of course is complete deregulation and removal from the National Firearms Act (NFA).


A reminder to participate in the TFB Suppressor Survey:
Help manufacturers, distributors, and dealers understand suppressor owners real needs and wants. Win prizes. Be cool.

SILENCER SATURDAY #215: SIG Sauer SLH300TI & SLH762 Suppressors

SILENCER SATURDAY: SIG Sauer SLH300TI & SLH762 Suppressors

SIG Sauer has a fantastic reputation in the silencer world. The now out-of-production SRD line of silencers are fairly light, rugged, and very quiet with the right host and ammunition. But additive manufacturing, the internal multi-flow path, and a new mounting system throws a wrench into the mix. Can SIG maintain a top spot in suppressor performance ratings?

When it comes to sound performance, the answer is yes. The SLH300TI is very quiet with subsonic ammunition on the SIG MCX. I have shot at least 20 different rifle suppressors on both the 6.75” and 9” MCX rifles and the SRD762QD-TI has always been my favorite. The SLH300TI-QD is just as quiet.

Both the SLX and SLH were developed to meet the demands of the U.S. military, and are designed to deliver cutting-edge performance.

The brake with the ability to time just the end piece is not my favorite however; it may have been that the crush washer was too hard or I was simply impatient. Either way, I’d rather have the flash hider. And while it was definitely the quietest, I did experience some short cycling on the 6.75” MCX. This gun was built to be suppressed so I have some investigating to do.

The SLH is ideal for users that use both supersonic and subsonic ammunition, and are optimized for sound reduction.

Comparing old and new:

SILENCER SATURDAY: SIG Sauer SLH300TI & SLH762 Suppressors

The SLH300TI-QD and muzzle device seats slightly closer to the gas controls than the SRD762-TI and it’s mount.

SILENCER SATURDAY: SIG Sauer SLH300TI & SLH762 Suppressors
  • Model: SLH300TI-QD
  • MSRP: TBD
  • Caliber: 300 Blk
  • Material:  Titanium
  • Diameter: 1.67 in (42 mm)
  • Length: 8.8 in (224 mm)
  • Weight: 1.0 lbs (16 oz)
  • Mounting System: Clutch-Lok QD
  • Model: SLH762-QD
  • MSRP: TBD
  • Caliber: 7.62 NATO
  • Material: Inconel
  • Diameter: 1.67 in (42 mm)
  • Length: 7.49 in (190 mm)
  • Weight: 1.32 lbs (21.1 oz)
  • Mounting System: Clutch-Lok QD

Swapping in the SLH762-QD on the MCX, I could definitely tell the two apart. The difference was approximately six decibels louder with the 762 model when shooting 300BLK subs (the human ear can only discern sound in three decibel increments).

SILENCER SATURDAY: SIG Sauer SLH300TI & SLH762 Suppressors

The 9” MCX sounded great and cycled perfectly.

SILENCER SATURDAY: SIG Sauer SLH300TI & SLH762 Suppressors

The SLH762-QD suppressed the 16” .308 SIG 716i very nicely. While not exactly hearing safe, it was fairly comfortable without hearing protection.

SILENCER SATURDAY: SIG Sauer SLH300TI & SLH762 Suppressors

I am happy and relieved to know that the SLH300TI is just as quiet as the SRD762TI on my favorite rifle, the SIG MCX Virtus in 300BLK. If you have the choice, my suggestion is opt for the one piece flash hider instead of the two piece brake. The last tests we will see with these cans is some full auto cycles of both 300BLK and 5.56mm. I’ll also report back on the 6.75” MCX cycling observation.

Thanks for reading. Be safe, have fun, and we’ll see you back next weekend for another Silencer Saturday.

SILENCER SATURDAY: SIG Sauer SLH300TI & SLH762 Suppressors

Silencer Saturday is Sponsored by Yankee Hill Machine

Silencer ShopHansohn BrOthers deadeye guns

Mac tactical

All YHM Products At Brownells

DEALERS: If you want your link to buy YHM suppressors included in future Silencer Saturday posts, email: silencers@thefirearmblog.com
Pete
Pete

Silencers - Science Pete@thefirearmblog.com

More by Pete

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 5 comments
  • Pedenzo Pedenzo on Feb 13, 2022

    Pete says:
    "To me, both of these seem like additional penalties for people already complying with draconian laws. "

    The ATF be like:

    https://uploads.disquscdn.c...

    comment photo
  • SpecDep SpecDep on Feb 17, 2022

    I put the SLH300TI on our latest batch of SIG MCX 300 BLK 6.75” guns we just got in. All MCX’s are issued with Romeo 4 RDS and MAGPUL 300 BLK specific magazines. . As the agency armorer, I always install all suppressors or any other accessories in the manner dictated by the manufacturer. I then confirm functionality and do a preliminary zero of irons and optics before the guns are placed in service. The individual deputy then confirms or adjusts zero to his eyes.
    Training ammo is Federal 220 gr OTM Subsonic. Duty ammo currently is Hornady 190 gr SUB X. I was not involved in the decision making process when the 190 SUB X was chosen. (don’t get me started on that one!) The Federal 220 gr runs fine. And locksthe bolt to the rear when last round is fired. The Hornady 190 gr SUB X on the other hand does not lock the bolt to the rear after last round is fired. I also did extensive testing to make sure that the 190 gr SUB X did cycle reliably otherwise. out of hundreds of rounds, not a single failure to feed.
    I tried both gas settings, no luck, I tried different magazines; GI, Brownells commercial GI Spec, MAGPUL 556 tye. No better with any other magazines. I tried some Hornady 135 gr FTX. That ran like a top. I had some other brands of supersonic and it all ran fine and locked the bolt to the rear when last round was fired. several other subsonic rounds also ran fine and locked the bolt to the rear after last round fired.
    Not being a ballistician , not having a lab or testing center to do quantitative analysis, I had to rely on 40+ years of shooting/gunsmithing, 30 years of military and LE experience. And my experience indicates that the Hornady 190 gr SUB X is just a low pressure round that does not generate enough gas pressure/volume to drive the carrier back far enough to engage the bolt catch. If anyone wants to provide a different conclusion, I would like to hear it. If anyone had similar experience with SUB X, I would like to hear that too.
    Needless to say, in light of this issue and my less than enthusiastic support for a subsonic duty round, I was able to convince the powers that be to allow me to change the duty round to something more appropriate. We now have a supersonic round on order and when ever it arrives (who knows) all subsonic will be replaced.
    Has anyone else had similar experiences with MCX and Hornady SUB X 190 gr??

Next