US Army Showcases Integrated Power System for Small Arms

Matthew Moss
by Matthew Moss
C5ISR Center senior enlisted adviser Master Sgt. Arean Harbison demonstrates the Small Tactical Universal Battery at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, in April 2025. (Photo Credit: Dan Lafontaine, C5ISR Center Public Affairs)

It's a concept that has been discussed for a long time but the US Army has recently showcased a new integrated battery system for its small arms systems. The Army’s Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Cyber, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (C5ISR) Center has shared photos of the new Small Tactical Universal Battery or STUB.


The C5ISR Center says it “is working across industry and several DoD organizations to more rapidly integrate these batteries with Solider-worn and -carried devices”, the photos shared by the C5ISR Center show the STUB integrated with the Army’s new M7 rifle. If fielded the new STUB system would develop an integrated power system capability that was originally mooted for the Next Generation Squad Weapon when the program initially launched in 2017.

C5ISR Center senior enlisted adviser Master Sgt. Arean Harbison and research mechanical engineer Dr. Nathan Sharpes demonstrate the Small Tactical Universal Battery at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, in April 2025. (Photo Credit: Dan Lafontaine, C5ISR Center Public Affairs)

While the Army press release on the new battery system has limited specific information, the images provided show an M7 rifle with a new buttstock which incorporates a battery interface. The system appears to power numerous enablers mounted on the rifle including an XM157 Next Generation Squad Weapon – Fire Control optic (which is normally powered by a pair of CR132 batteries) and an Individual Weapon Sight - thermal clip on. While not shown the STUB system will likely also power light, laser modules and other enablers. The system appears to have a control interface, an assembly on the right side of the upper and a cable management system. There’s no publicly available information on the power outputs or weights of the batteries or the system interface.


Three DEVCOM centers — Armaments Center, Army Research Lab, and Soldier Center are working with the C5ISR Center, along with industry partners, to develop and test STUB.

According to an Army release STUB delivers different battery sizes that share a common mechanical and electrical interface which enables interoperability. Each of the battery sizes provides a different amount of power which can be selected to suit soldier and mission requirements.

Close up of the STUB system (Photo Credit: Dan Lafontaine, C5ISR Center Public Affairs)

Dr. Nathan Sharpes, a C5ISR Center research mechanical engineer, noted that: “Any battery in the STUB family will be able to attach to any device designed for it because of the standard interface. Soldiers can focus more on their missions and less on which types of batteries and how many of each to carry.”


C5ISR Center senior enlisted adviser Master Sgt. Arean Harbison and research mechanical engineer Dr. Nathan Sharpes demonstrate the Small Tactical Universal Battery at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, in April 2025. (Photo Credit: Dan Lafontaine, C5ISR Center Public Affairs)

“Standardizing the power type lets us achieve that long fight that we need to build the future,” Master Sgt. Arean Harbison said. “The STUB will be a better fix than what we’ve had in the past of resupplying batteries. Now we’re looking at potentially charging in the observation post and not needing resupply. To remain lethal, we need to sustain ourselves with additional power. Power becomes a form of lethality.”


The next step for C5ISR Center’s STUB system is for Project Manager Soldier Lethality, which is responsible for current and future weapon development, to explore further development and fielding.

Matthew Moss
Matthew Moss

Managing Editor: TheFirearmBlog.com & Overt Defense.com. Matt is a British historian specialising in small arms development and military history. He has written several books and for a variety of publications in both the US and UK. Matt is also runs The Armourer's Bench, a video series on historically significant small arms. Here on TFB he covers product and current military small arms news. Reach Matt at: matt@thefirearmblog.com

More by Matthew Moss

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 17 comments
  • Kev85121017 Kev85121017 on Aug 25, 2025

    Soldiers need to carry less eight, not more. Rifles and optics can be made light and optics can be more battery efficient. Also, using modern rechargeable batteries can reduce the logistics load and be charged in vehicles or with foldable lightweight solar cells. One big problem is non-trigger pullers wanting to micromanage the battlefield with data. They dream of things where every asset transmits data/images and reports to a center data collection server in DC. They also want body cameras, microphones, round counters and even "kill switches" to disable soldier weapons, likely run by AI. This is of course a 100% disaster.

  • Pal85406008 Pal85406008 on Aug 25, 2025

    More shinola for the average grunt to carry. By contrast I just acquired a six-pound POF Rogue in 7.62 NATO. All I've put on it is a set of MAGPUL BUIS.

Next