Modern Personal Defense Weapon Calibers 013: The .22 TCM and .22 TCM 9R

Nathaniel F
by Nathaniel F
Left to right: 9x19mm Parabellum, .38 Super, .22 TCM, 5.56x45mm NATO, 5.7x28mm SS197.

It has been a little while since we visited the subject of modern personal defense weapon calibers, so to start it off again we’ll be taking a look at a new high velocity round that is only a few years old: Armscor’s .22 TCM. This round was reportedly developed by Fred Craig as a high velocity caliber for the 1911 platform, and picked up by Philippine company Armscor. Originally called the “.22 Mini Mag”, the .22 TCM (Tuason-Craig Magnum, after Craig and Armscor’s president) is designed to fit inside the magazine well of a 1911 and function from .38 Super 1911 magazines. Although a pistol round, the .22 TCM is based off the .223 Remington case, shortened by about three quarters of an inch. Thanks to the thick web of its parent case, the .22 TCM is capable of handling high pressures of 40,000 PSI. A version with a shortened projectile, the .22 TCM 9R, is compatible with shorter 9mm magazines for weapons like the Glock 17.

On to the ballistics:

Note: “5.56x25mmRF” is .22 WMR. A while back I decided all the labels on these graphs would use a standardized metric format, for some reason. It hasn’t caused an ambiguous situation until now, and by the time I caught it on this one, the graphs were already done. Sorry!

The .22 TCM does precisely what its designer intended: It offers a round that produces high muzzle velocities but that is compatible with the 1911 platform. The round is limited, however, by its very modest ballistic shape. Despite its weight of 40 grains, the .22 TCM’s bullet has a low ballistic coefficient of about 0.116 G1 (equivalent to about 0.050-0.060 G7), meaning it sheds its velocity rapidly. Therefore, the .22 TCM is probably best considered a pistol round only, best suited for ranges below 50 meters or so.

In terms of weight, the .22 TCM is a bit heavier than its primary rival, the 5.7x28mm FN, at 8 grams.

Nathaniel F
Nathaniel F

Nathaniel is a history enthusiast and firearms hobbyist whose primary interest lies in military small arms technological developments beginning with the smokeless powder era. He can be reached via email at nathaniel.f@staff.thefirearmblog.com.

More by Nathaniel F

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 29 comments
  • Int19h Int19h on Jul 27, 2017

    I was always curious about that claim that .22 TCM is derived from .223. Armscor also sells a 1911 kit that can do both .22 TCM and 9x19mm with only a barrel swap, implying that the bolt face is identical for both of these. Did they have to fiddle with the case to do this, or is it the original .223 dimensions?

    By the way, Armscor also makes a .22 TCM bolt-action rifle. That one doesn't have the barrel easily swappable, but of course a gunsmith can do that. And that's how you get an integrally suppressed 9mm bolt action:

    http://www.specialinteresta...

    • Giolli Joker Giolli Joker on Jul 28, 2017

      @int19h It is a cut down .223.

      .223 dimensions:
      Base diameter 0.376 in (9.6 mm)
      Rim diameter 0.378 in (9.6 mm)
      Rim thickness 0.045 in (1.1 mm)

      9x19mm dimensions:
      Base diameter 9.93 mm (0.391 in)
      Rim diameter 9.96 mm (0.392 in)
      Rim thickness 1.27 mm (0.050 in)

      (unit of measure preference as per relevant wikipedia pages)

      Apparently the difference is minimal enough to allow the use of a single bolt face.

  • USMCM14 USMCM14 on Jul 27, 2017

    I own both the 22TCM and the 5.7X28 and the 22TCM beats the 5.7x28 every time with the same weight bullet's and if you reload its the 22TCM hands down by not having to deal with polymer coated cases !!! The truth is they should have went with the "224 BOZ" a 10MM case necked down to 22 caliber 50 gn. bullets at 2500 fps beats the crap out of both of them !!

    • See 2 previous
    • Nathaniel F. Nathaniel F. on Jul 28, 2017

      @USMCM14 The ballistic coefficient of the 5.7x28mm is much better than that of the .22 TCM, unless you're loading long for the magazine with the TCM.

Next