The US Army is in the Market for More Miniguns

Matthew Moss
by Matthew Moss
Helicopter-mounted M134D (Dillon Aero)

The US Army is in the market for more 7.62x51mm M134 ‘Miniguns’. A Request for Information (or RFI) was posted on the US Government’s new SAM procurement website on 30th January, 2020. The sources sought notice covers not just the M134 weapon system but also the necessary tools, parts and accessories to keep the guns in action. The ‘market survey’ is seeking “to identify sources/vendors capable of supplying M134” and its accessories.

The US Army primarily mounts the M134 ‘Minigun’ aboard its transport helicopters as a suppression fire and point target engagement weapon to provide support to ground troops or those disembarking from aircraft.

A USMC M134 in action, in Aug. 2015 (USMC/ Cpl. Michael Dye)

Developed in the late 1950s by General Electric the six barrelled ‘Minigun’ entered production in 1963/4 and has seen action in every US conflict since the Vietnam War. The US Air Force and US Navy also use the ‘Minigun’ under the designations GAU-2/A and GAU-17/A. With a variable rate of fire up to 6,000 rounds per minute the 7.62x51mm full-auto Gatling gun is a formidable and flexible weapon. While General Electric successfully scaled down their 20x102mm rotary-barrel M61 Vulcan aircraft cannon, which had been in development since the late 1940s, the technical package for the weapon has since disseminated with a number of companies offering Minigun-patterned weapons. These companies include Dillon Aero, Garwood Industries and General Dynamics (who produce a .50 calibre variant).

As is usual with RFIs and sources sought notices, the US Army has made clear that the purpose of the notice is to “obtain information from industry to assist in the market research” and shouldn’t be considered “as a Request for Proposal (RFP) or a commitment by the U.S. Government.” The Army has given small companies (of 1,000 or less employees) until the 13th February, 2020 to respond to the questionaire about their capabilities to manufacture the M134 and its parts and accessories. The notice clarifies that ‘parts and accessories’ include: “power supplies, mounts, spare part kits, spare barrels, Support equipment should include maintenance kits and special tools packages.”

Source

Matthew Moss
Matthew Moss

Managing Editor: TheFirearmBlog.com & Overt Defense.com. Matt is a British historian specialising in small arms development and military history. He has written several books and for a variety of publications in both the US and UK. Matt is also runs The Armourer's Bench, a video series on historically significant small arms. Here on TFB he covers product and current military small arms news. Reach Matt at: matt@thefirearmblog.com

More by Matthew Moss

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 58 comments
  • Blackhawk Blackhawk on Feb 08, 2020

    Unless things have changed drastically in the past 10 years, the standard suppression weapon for the UH-60 is the M240B machine gun. The M134 was primarily used by SOAR assets. Even the OH-58D was using a .50BMG in a pod mount the last I heard. We had M134s briefly when I first got to an AirCav unit in Korea in 1974, but we had to turn them in.

  • MajorMalfunctions MajorMalfunctions on Feb 16, 2020

    Garwood Industries? Tracy Garwood is now a convicted FELON (falsifying the destruction of parts that were then sold to the cartel in Mexico)....how can he possibly be qualified to partake in the process? It was only Tracy and ONE other guy that worked at Garwood Industries. I think they changed their name to GI Defense now, but Tracy is still somehow involved according to the people that I know. That guy is absolute poison! No way in hell should an alias business name be used as cover! I am going to keep an eye on this if it enters the RFP stage.

Next